Georgia appeals court disqualifies Fulton County DA Fani Willis from prosecuting Trump

CNN

By Katelyn Polantz, Hannah Rabinowitz and Sara Murray, CNN

(CNN) — A Georgia Court of Appeals on Thursday disqualified Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from prosecuting the case against President-elect Donald Trump and his alleged co-conspirators over their efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

The long-awaited decision, in a state criminal case against Trump that was already on hold, raises questions about whether the case can move forward in court. The appeals court found that Willis’ office can’t prosecute the case, so a new special prosecutor would need to be appointed for the case to continue.

The appeals court found that a “significant appearance of impropriety” was enough to potentially taint the case in the public eye. The appellate court decided, however, it wouldn’t dismiss the sprawling racketeering conspiracy case entirely.

“While we recognize that an appearance of impropriety generally is not enough to support disqualification, this is the rare case in which disqualification is mandated and no other remedy will suffice to restore public confidence in the integrity of these proceedings,” the court wrote in Thursday’s opinion.

The court added: “We cannot conclude that the record also supports the imposition of the extreme sanction of dismissal of the indictment.”

Willis will continue to fight to stay on the case, as her team has asked the state’s Supreme Court to review the appeals court’s decision. CNN has reached out to her office for comment.

Trump and some of his co-defendants have been trying to get Willis, a Democrat, disqualified from the case because of a romantic relationship she had with Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor she hired to help handle the case. The defendants argued that Willis financially benefited from the relationship with Wade, who defense attorneys say covered several vacations for the pair.

Ruling reviewed decision that allowed Willis to stay on case

In their 2-1 majority opinion, Judges Trenton Brown III and Todd Markle wrote that trial judge Scott McAfee’s March ruling allowing Willis to continue on the case “did nothing to prevent an ongoing appearance of impropriety that existed at times when DA Willis was exercising her broad pretrial discretion about who to prosecute and what charges to bring.”

Judge Benjamin Land, however, wrote in his dissent that the majority overstepped its authority in overturning McAfee’s ruling.

To make their decision, the panel of three appeals judges could only review McAfee’s ruling. They could not independently review any of the allegations that Trump or his co-defendants made about Willis’ alleged affair with Wade or details of her financial gain. Willis denies benefiting financially from the case and claims her relationship with Wade did not influence her decision to prosecute.

“It is not our job to second guess trial judges or to substitute our judgement for theirs,” Land wrote in his dissent.

“We should resist the temptation to interfere with that discretion, including its chosen remedy, just because we happen to see things differently,” he continued. “Doing otherwise violates well-established precedent, threatens the discretion given to trial courts, and blurs the distinction between our respective courts.”

Ashleigh Merchant, a defense attorney whose original court filing seeking to disqualify Willis set this chain of events in motion, praised the appeals court’s decision and said in a statement to CNN that Willis should have voluntarily recused herself months ago.

“Failing to do so put Judge McAfee in an untenable position,” said Merchant, who represents Mike Roman, a former Trump 2020 campaign official. “This failure of judgment is the exact reason Mr. Roman was forced to move to disqualify her in the first place, so we are thankful that the court agreed she should not be allowed to prosecute this case any further.”

Steve Sadow, Trump’s lead counsel in the case, said Thursday’s decision “puts an end to a politically motivated persecution of the next President of the United States.”

Steven Cheung, a Trump spokesman, said in a statement: “In granting President Trump an overwhelming mandate, the American People have demanded an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and a swift dismissal of all the Witch Hunts against him. We look forward to uniting our country as President Trump Makes America Great Again.”

Additional legal proceedings to come

Further appeals could drag out the situation even more.

Trump and his co-defendants continue to challenge the case with several other legal arguments that are still being considered by McAfee in the trial court. That includes challenges that raise immunity around the presidency, and the ability of a state to bring a case that has some duplication with federal allegations against Trump that are now dismissed.

Willis previously signaled in post-election court filings that she intended to move ahead with her prosecution even as Trump is set to return to the Oval Office.

The Georgia Supreme Court sits above the Georgia Court of Appeals that ruled on Thursday, and could review Willis’ prosecutorial ability again, meaning she would not automatically be removed. The Georgia Court of Appeals canceled having oral arguments on Willis, and their ruling Thursday came as a surprise, with the court deciding only on the written papers and McAfee’s prior decision.

The Georgia case also marks the most significant legal exposure some of Trump’s top allies — including Rudy Giuliani and Mark Meadows — face for their efforts to try to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Once all potential appeals are exhausted and the case is remitted back to Superior Court of Fulton County, under Georgia law, the case would automatically be reassigned to the Prosecuting Attorney’s Council of Georgia, a bipartisan collaboration of six district attorneys and three solicitor generals from across the state.

Executive Director Peter Skandalakis told CNN he would be responsible for “looking at the pool of candidates” to appoint a new attorney to oversee the case. The pool includes anyone licensed to practice in the state, meaning a new district attorney could be appointed, a private lawyer, the state attorney general or one of the members who sit on the council.

“Once I get it, I start the process of trying to find a conflict lawyer, and I look for somebody who has the resources and would be interested and actually willing to take on the case,” Skandalakis told CNN.

“It won’t be an easy lift,” he said.

This story has been updated with additional information and reaction.

CNN’s Paula Reid, Nick Valencia and Jason Morris contributed to this report.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2024 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.