Iowa election officials sued by 4 naturalized citizens who say their right to vote was harmed

Associated Press

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Four voters and a Hispanic civil rights group sued Iowa’s top election official, alleging he infringed upon their rights when he directed election workers to challenge some voters’ ballots in an attempt to keep ineligible noncitizens from illegally voting.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa filed a legal challenge in federal court late Wednesday on behalf of four individuals flagged by Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate as registered voters who might not be citizens. They are naturalized citizens, according to the complaint. The suit also names some of Iowa’s county auditors, who are tasked with facilitating elections.

Concern about elections being undermined by noncitizen voting has been a focus of political messaging this year from Republican presidential nominee and former President Donald Trump and other Republicans, even though such voting is rare in American elections.

Pate’s office said last week that it provided county auditors with a list of 2,022 people who told the state’s Department of Transportation that they are not citizens but subsequently registered to vote or voted. Since those individuals may have become naturalized citizens in the lapsed time, Pate’s office told county elections officials to challenge their ballots and have them cast a provisional ballot instead.

They would have seven days — one more than usual because of a federal holiday — to provide proof of their citizenship status so that their ballot is counted.

Orcun Selcuk is one new voter who registered last year, a day after he became a U.S. citizen, and has since voted in elections without issue. He voted early this month but recently received a letter stating that his ballot was being challenged.

Now, the native of Turkey who settled in Decorah fears other new citizens will be intimidated.

“As a political science professor, I understand and feel deeply about the importance of voting in a democracy,” he said.

The ACLU is also representing the League of United Latin American Citizens, or LULAC, of Iowa.

It is illegal for non-U.S. citizens to vote in federal elections, but there is no evidence that it is occurring in significant numbers, though Iowa and some other states have identified dozens of such cases.

Before the lawsuit was filed, Pate told reporters at a news conference Wednesday that the DOT list is the “only list that we have available to us” without access to federal immigration records.

“We’re balancing this process. We want everyone to be able to vote. That’s why none of them have been taken off the voter rolls,” he said. But “we do owe an obligation to make sure that they are citizens now.”

With early voting well underway and just days to go before the Nov. 5 election, the lawsuit asks for the list to be rescinded and voters on it to not be challenged on this basis. It alleges Iowa’s election officials are burdening the right to vote and discriminating against naturalized citizens, treating these voters differently from others in violation of their constitutional right to equal protection.

Rita Bettis Austen, ACLU of Iowa’s legal director, said Thursday that Pate is “spearheading an effort to disenfranchise Iowa U.S. citizens” when he should be protecting voting rights.

“He is fueling a false narrative about voter fraud by noncitizens and laying the groundwork to undermine confidence in the election,” she said.

Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird said in a statement that LULAC is attempting a last-minute effort to “let noncitizens illegally vote.”

“I am fighting to defend our long-standing election integrity laws and ensure Iowans can maintain trust in our elections,” she said.

The Associated Press left email messages with Pate’s office on Thursday seeking comment on the ACLU’s lawsuit.

Election officials routinely check voter lists for anyone who might not be eligible and remove them under processes set by federal and state laws. Some state’s efforts to remove people from voter lists close to the election have been challenged.

Since no voter has been removed from Iowa’s lists, Pate tried to differentiate Iowa from other states, such as Virginia, where more than 1,600 voters were purged from the voter registration list in the past two months in a program enacted through an Aug. 7 executive order from Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin.

The Justice Department and a coalition of private groups sued Virginia earlier in October, arguing that state election officials violated federal law’s 90-day “quiet period” ahead of elections.

The National Voter Registration Act requires that quiet period so that legitimate voters are not removed from the rolls by bureaucratic errors or last-minute mistakes that cannot be quickly corrected.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative majority said Wednesday that Virginia could continue, overruling a federal judge that said the state’s purge was illegal. A federal appeals court had previously allowed the judge’s order to remain in effect.

In a similar lawsuit in Alabama, a federal judge this month ordered the state to restore eligibility for more than 3,200 voters who had been deemed ineligible noncitizens. Testimony from state officials in that case showed that roughly 2,000 of the 3,251 voters who were made inactive were actually legally registered citizens.

In eastern Johnson County, Iowa, home to more than 110,000 registered voters and the University of Iowa in Iowa City, county auditor Erin Shane said Thursday that her office is working to confirm the citizenship status of the 295 names they received.

Shane, who was named in the lawsuit because one of the voters lives in Johnson County, said officials have notified each person and so far confirmed that 63 people are U.S. citizens; one person “was referred to law enforcement for additional clarification,” she said.

“We still have 232 people left to confirm and it is unfortunately happening when our office is in its busiest season,” she said. “The people who have received our letters are coming into our office with a range of emotions from disappointment to understandably angry.”